WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Zoom Proposes Settlement for Class-Action Lawsuit

Topics: Consumer Law

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Remote meeting software-giant Zoom became a household name over the course of the pandemic.  Zoom, both the company and the software, have been around longer than most people would think.  Zoom Video Communications, the company, was founded in 2011 and Zoom, the software, was initially released in 2013.  A proposed class-action settlement would compensate every person who used Zoom between March 30, 2016 and July 30, 2021 with $15.  Zoom subscribers would be eligible for the greater of $25 or 15 percent of their subscription fees during that time.  The proposed settlement amount is $85 million, so payouts may change based on how many Zoom users make a claim.  The company would also be required to improve security and data protection. The class-action lawsuit stems from a false claim the company made about encryption.  Zoom had made claims that their software featured end-to-end encryption in order to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).  In practice, only customers utilizing a specific Zoom product were receiving that level of protection.  The lack of purported end-to-end encryption came to light in March 2020, just when the pandemic began forcing many employees to work remotely. The lack of true end-to-end encryption and a reliance on Facebook and Google meant a lot of personal data was sent unencrypted over the Internet.  The class-action lawsuit accuses Zoom of willfully misrepresenting its security protocols and misleading consumers, a clear violation of product liability law.  Though some may think that personal injury attorneys can only pursue companies for dangerous manufactured goods, product liability law also protects consumers from damages or injuries caused by intangible software. See the full news story here. The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help injured consumers pursue negligent corporations for the design, manufacturing, or advertising of any damaged or faulty product.  We provide free consultations at 888-517-9888, so call us today.  There is no risk in pursuing a claim with a no recovery, no fee guarantee.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

San Gabriel Valley Master Key – Episode 40 – Danny Woo

Topics: San Gabriel Valley Master Key

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Episode 40 of the San Gabriel Valley Master Key podcast, co-hosted by Attorney Scott Warmuth, has been recently published on the podcasting sites! Episode 40 features Danny Woo, Science Teacher and Basketball Coach.

Episode Description:

Danny Woo is a proud son of a single mother who taught him the values of humility, integrity, and community. When his mother brought him to America at age 4, they faced housing and income insecurity, but with her hustle and support from extended family, they set roots in Monterey Park, California. Danny is the product of the local schools, and is a proud graduate of Mark Keppel High School.

For over 20 years Danny has dedicated himself to the youth, as a middle school science teacher in Los Angeles and West Covina, and as a basketball coach at his alma mater. He is passionate about bringing out a youths full potential, and is successful in doing so. He learned such skills from a past coach in his own youth when he was part of a Chinese Basketball group. Today he is a proud and loving father and husband who is getting back into the game of coaching basketball.

Available now on Spotify, YouTube, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, and iHeartRADIOVisit the San Gabriel Valley Master Key website for more information.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Letter of the Law – Making a Safe “U” Turn

Topics: Auto Accident

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]It's your friend's birthday, and he has invited your family out to dinner in an area of the city that you're not very familiar with.  It's Friday night, traffic is heavy, and you have no idea where this fancy new restaurant is.  You're focused on driving, so it takes a moment to realize that your significant other in the passenger seat has pointed out "we just passed it."  You've realized it is too late to make the turn, so you go straight through the next intersection.  For some reason you turn down the volume of the radio in the preparation to turn around, unsure exactly of where or how to do it. U-turns are not illegal in California, but there are guidelines to when and where a vehicle can make one.  The DMV provides some specific guidelines as to when a U-turn is allowed:
  • Across double yellow lines
  • In residential areas with no vehicles approaching you within 200 feet
  • In residential areas when protected from oncoming traffic by a sign, light, or signal
  • At an intersection with a green light or arrow, unless a No U-turn sign is posted
  • At an opening in the center divider of a divided highway
In all of the above circumstances however, legal U-turns must be made only when it is safe to do so.  Making a U-turn that results in a collision will likely place the driver making the U-turn at fault.  The DMV also advises when a U-turn is expressly illegal:
  • Wherever a No U-turn sign is posted
  • When starting from any lane but the left-most lane moving in the direction of travel
  • When you cannot see 200 feet in every direction due to visual obstructions, including bad weather
  • When you might collide with other vehicles
  • When you might collide with pedestrians
  • At railroad crossings
  • At or in front of a fire station
  • In a business district, except at intersections or turn lanes
  • Anywhere but an opening in the center divider of a divided highway
The driver of the vehicle in the initial example is likely in a business district and would need to find another intersection or turn lane that does not have a posted No U-turn sign.  The driver would also need to wait for a green light or arrow at the intersection or a minimum 200 foot break in traffic from a clearly marked turn lane. See the full DMV turns page here. Vehicles making illegal U-turns can cause serious car crashes resulting in personal injury.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth encourages all drivers to make responsible U-turns.  Our team of car accident attorneys help the victims of car collisions treat their medical injuries, repair their vehicles, recover lost wages, and seek compensation for the pain and suffering experienced in the crash.  For a free consultation, call our offices today at 888-517-9888.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

San Gabriel Valley Master Key – Episode 42 – Let’s Recap Episodes 21-40

Topics: San Gabriel Valley Master Key

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Episode 42 of the San Gabriel Valley Master Key podcast, co-hosted by Attorney Scott Warmuth, has been officially released! Episode 42 features a recap of episodes 21-40 with Scott, Russell, and Victoria Ahlers.

Episode Description:

Scott and Russell are joined by Victoria to share some moments from each show that stood out to them. In this part 1 of Review Time they go through Episodes 01 - 20, from Andrew  Rodriguez to Time Fall.

Available now on Spotify, YouTube, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, and iHeartRADIOVisit the San Gabriel Valley Master Key website for more information.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Lawsuit Filed Against Activision Blizzard for Toxic Working Environment

Topics: Employment Law

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The State of California has filed a lawsuit against Santa Monica headquartered video game giant Activision Blizzard alleging violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.  The company, which employs about 9,500 people, is accused of creating a toxic work environment, especially for women, who allegedly suffered from harassment, lower starting wages, and lack of promotion.  Women who did receive promotions allegedly received less total compensation than males in the same position. Activision Blizzard is responsible for developing and publishing several popular video game franchises, including Warcraft, Diablo, and Call of Duty.  The lawsuit filed by the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) goes into great detail about some of the alleged violations of employment law, accusing the company of allowing a culture of discrimination and harassment of women to flourish in what is described as a "frat boy" workplace culture.  Under California law, DFEH is allowed to pursue civil action against a defendant on behalf of those affected by illegal behavior. The lawsuit can be read in its entirety here. Since the lawsuit was announced last week, Activision Blizzard has denied the allegations, claiming they are false, distorted, and out of context.  About 1,600 current and former employees of the company signed an open letter calling the company response to the lawsuit insulting. Employment law was written to protect workers from discrimination and harassment.  When a company allows violations of worker rights to occur, the company can be held liable for those violations.  Most violations of employment law do not occur on the scale seen in the Activision Blizzard lawsuit, and some violations can be hard to pursue without the help of a dedicated employment law attorney. The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth helps the victims of discrimination and harassment seek financial compensation after violations of employment law.  We offer 100% free consultations and case evaluations and do not charge any legal fees unless we win your case.  Call 888-517-9888 to speak with one of our employment law team today![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

$26 Billion Settlement Announced Over Opioids

Topics: Consumer Law

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Numerous states, including California, reached a settlement with four healthcare giants over claims that the companies were at least partially responsible for an opioid overdose epidemic.  Over the past 20 years, hundreds of thousands of Americans have died from opioid overdose, including a record of 93,000 people last year.  Three pharmaceutical distributors: AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson Corporation, would pay $21 billion over 18 years, and pharmaceutical manufacturer Johnson & Johnson would pay $5 billion over nine years under the maximum payout guidelines of the settlement. Johnson & Johnson has been at the center of numerous product liability lawsuits recently, including claims against talc baby powder resulting in billions of dollars in damages.  The settlement and jury amounts appear to be significant, but they still pale in comparison to the company's revenue and profits.  Johnson & Johnson stopped selling opioid medications last year. The settlement itself is contingent on enough state and local governments signing on to it.  The overall settlement amount would be reduced for every state or local government entity that does not agree to the settlement.  According to reporting, numerous states are reluctant to sign on because they fear they may not receive enough resources to address the opioid epidemic.  Recovery money from the settlement might be used for addiction treatment, recovery programs, counseling services, rehabilitation, and even needle exchanges. See the full news story here. Over 3,000 lawsuits have been filed in relation to the opioid epidemic so far targeting numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors.  Just like every other consumer product, the makers of every pharmaceutical drug is responsible for the safety of its product.  When a company designs, manufacturers, or markets a dangerous product that results in injury, consumers and entities representing consumers can pursue legal damages under product liability law.  If you have been injured by a dangerous or recalled product, the Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help you pursue financial recovery for medical bills and pain and suffering.  Call us today at 888-517-9888 to receive a free legal consultation.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Texas Judge Rules DACA Program Illegal

Topics: Immigration

Feature
Last Friday, a federal judge in Texas declared the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program created under the Obama administration as unlawful.  The new ruling allows existing DACA recipients to continue to live and work in the United States without fear of deportation but prevents the federal government from considering and approving new applications.  According to legal experts, even if a DACA application was submitted prior to the ruling on Friday, it can no longer be approved. Dreamers, young immigrants brought to the country as children, have faced an uncertain future ever since the Trump administration unsuccessfully attempted to rescind DACA in 2017.  The latest ruling will likely be appealed by the Biden administration and other interested parties, but the chances of a successful appeal are in doubt.  The appeal would be heard by the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, which has been fairly hostile to immigration rights in recent years.  The US Supreme Court has previously ruled that the Trump administration's attempt to end the program was improper, but has not ruled on the legality of the program itself.  Three of the current Supreme Court Justices have previously called DACA illegal in court filings. See the full news story here. DACA recipients have been on a roller coaster over the past few years, never knowing if the program will end.  DACA allows Dreamers to pursue educations, careers, and a life in America.  Should the program end, the lives of DACA recipients would face extreme upheaval.  So too would their schools, employers, and family, many of whom are United States citizens.  Congressional action is expected to address the plight of Dreamers, but it is yet unknown what that action will look like or whether it will be successful. Even with the challenges facing DACA right now, it is recommended that current DACA recipients renew their status as soon as they can.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help DACA recipients renew their status.  Call our immigration team today at 888-517-9888 for a free consultation.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Double+ Solid Lines on Freeway Mean Do Not Cross, Regardless of Color

Topics: Auto Accident

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Drivers who use multiple different Southern California freeways may notice significant differences in how carpool lanes are treated.  While most freeway carpool lanes are available for any carpool or qualified electric vehicle, some parts of the 10, 110, and 91 require a transponder.  While most freeway carpool lanes have dedicated entrances and exits, some, like the 22 and parts of the inland 60 do not.  And while some carpool lanes have quadruple yellow lines separating them from other traffic, some only have double white lines. Contrary to popular belief, it does not matter what color the solid lines separating carpool lanes from regular traffic are, nor how many solid lines there are.  For carpool lanes, two or more solid white lines and two or more solid yellow lines mean the same thing:  DO NOT CROSS.  Entering or exiting the carpool lane anywhere but the designated section is considered a moving violation and will result in a point against your driver's license.  The minimum fine is $490 and can even result in increased insurance premiums. Entrances and exits to the carpool lane are typically denoted by a broken white line.  The entrances are usually marked overhead by this sign:[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image="5465" img_size="full" alignment="center" el_class="desktop"][vc_single_image image="5466" img_size="full" alignment="center" el_class="mobile"][vc_column_text]Entering and exiting the carpool lane outside of designated broken white lines is extremely dangerous, especially if the flow of traffic is dramatically different.  Under most circumstances, if a driver crosses a double solid line to enter or exit the carpool lane and is involved in the crash, that driver will be found at fault, even if the driver is rear-ended. The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth encourages drivers using the car pool lanes to enter and exit across dashed white lines at designated entrances and exits.  If you or a loved one has been injured in a motor vehicle accident through no fault of your own, contact our law offices today at 888-517-9888 for a free legal consultation.  We can help you seek medical treatment and financial recovery for damaged property and lost wages.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

San Gabriel Valley Master Key – Episode 41 – Let’s Recap Episodes 1-20

Topics: San Gabriel Valley Master Key

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Episode 41 of the San Gabriel Valley Master Key podcast, co-hosted by Attorney Scott Warmuth, has been officially released! Episode 41 features a recap of the first 20 episodes with Scott, Russell, and Victoria Ahlers.

Episode Description:

Scott and Russell are joined by Victoria to share some moments from each show that stood out to them. In this part 1 of Review Time they go through Episodes 01 - 20, from Andrew  Rodriguez to Time Fall.

Available now on Spotify, YouTube, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, and iHeartRADIOVisit the San Gabriel Valley Master Key website for more information.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Independence Day Weekend MEP Results in 997 DUI Arrests

Topics: Auto Accident, Criminal Defense

Feature
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Over the Independence Day holiday weekend, California Highway Patrol (CHP) arrested 997 drivers on suspicion of driving under the influence (DUI).  CHP conducted a Maximum Enforcement Period (MEP) for the holiday weekend beginning Friday, July 2 at 6:01 pm until Monday, July 5 at 11:59 pm, similar to what it did for Memorial Day weekend MEP.  The number of drivers arrested was slightly higher than Memorial Day, which saw 979 DUI arrests by CHP. CHP also reported on the number of fatalities it saw in crashes over the weekend: 43, which was also higher than Memorial Day weekend.  CHP did not identify how many fatal car accident victims were the result of suspected drunk driving but did indicate that many of the victims were not wearing a seat belt. A conviction for driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol carries stiff penalties.  The penalties become harsher if the driver has been previously convicted of DUI, if a vehicle crash resulting in property damage occurs, or if someone is injured or killed as the result of DUI.  Penalties can include significant jail time, fines and court fees, suspended driving privileges, probation, and community service requirements. The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth wants to remind everyone that drinking and driving is against the law.  It is always best to designate a sober driver or find alternative transportation, such as ride shares, taxis, or public transit.  Regardless of CHP special operations, it is never okay to drink and drive.  Please stay safe on the roads every time you drive.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]