WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Texas Judge Rules DACA Program Illegal

Topics: Immigration

Feature
Last Friday, a federal judge in Texas declared the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program created under the Obama administration as unlawful.  The new ruling allows existing DACA recipients to continue to live and work in the United States without fear of deportation but prevents the federal government from considering and approving new applications.  According to legal experts, even if a DACA application was submitted prior to the ruling on Friday, it can no longer be approved. Dreamers, young immigrants brought to the country as children, have faced an uncertain future ever since the Trump administration unsuccessfully attempted to rescind DACA in 2017.  The latest ruling will likely be appealed by the Biden administration and other interested parties, but the chances of a successful appeal are in doubt.  The appeal would be heard by the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, which has been fairly hostile to immigration rights in recent years.  The US Supreme Court has previously ruled that the Trump administration’s attempt to end the program was improper, but has not ruled on the legality of the program itself.  Three of the current Supreme Court Justices have previously called DACA illegal in court filings. See the full news story here. DACA recipients have been on a roller coaster over the past few years, never knowing if the program will end.  DACA allows Dreamers to pursue educations, careers, and a life in America.  Should the program end, the lives of DACA recipients would face extreme upheaval.  So too would their schools, employers, and family, many of whom are United States citizens.  Congressional action is expected to address the plight of Dreamers, but it is yet unknown what that action will look like or whether it will be successful. Even with the challenges facing DACA right now, it is recommended that current DACA recipients renew their status as soon as they can.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help DACA recipients renew their status.  Call our immigration team today at 888-517-9888 for a free consultation.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Supreme Court Rejects Johnson & Johnson Appeal of $2 Billion Talc Verdict

Topics: Consumer Law, Personal Injury

Feature
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) Baby Powder and other J&J talc-based products have been linked to ovarian cancer, leading to thousands of lawsuits and many multi-million dollar jury verdicts.  One such case was decided in July 2018, where 22 women and their families were awarded $4.7 billion by a Missouri jury.  The original award included $550 million in compensatory damages and $4.14 billion in punitive damages, which was later reduced to about $2 billion overall.  Two of the 22 women were also dropped from the lawsuit at that time. On Tuesday, the US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by J&J to vacate the $2 billion verdict on the grounds that the Missouri courts should not have combined the 22 cases together, which J&J argues confused the jury due to differing state laws.  The court did not indicate why it rejected the appeal. It is unclear whether J&J plans to appeal the Missouri verdict on other grounds. See the full news report here. J&J maintains that its products are safe.  Key to many of the trials was a trove of J&J internal documents that documented its raw and refined talc sometimes being contaminated with asbestos, a known source of cancer, which J&J kept hidden from regulators and the public.  Reuters ran a special report on this topic in December of 2018 and can be found here. Companies that design, manufacture, or market a product that harms consumers can be pursued for financial damages.  If you have been injured or harmed by a faulty product, you may be entitled to recovery under a product liability action known as a mass tort.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth provides a free consultation and case evaluation to anyone who has been harmed by a dangerous or recalled product.  Call us today at 888-517-9888 to schedule your consultation.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Riding Bicycles Safely this Summer

Topics: Personal Injury

Feature
It is officially summertime!  After the challenges of 2020, lots of people are excited to get out and about this summer.  For many, that means taking to the streets and trails on a bicycle.  Learning to ride a bicycle is something that most of us learn how to do.  Learning to ride a bicycle safely, however, is something that is not.  Riding a bicycle can be dangerous, especially in a city setting.  Following these safety tips can help you reduce the risk of being seriously injured in a bicycle accident. Wear Safety Gear
  • Bicycle Helmet – While cyclists over the age of 18 are not legally required to wear a bicycle helmet in California, wearing a helmet can save your life in the event of a crash.  Helmet have been found to protect against head injury, traumatic brain injury, face injury, and death.
  • Lights and Reflectors – California law requires that bicycles have a white headlight, a rear red reflector, and white or yellow reflectors on the pedals while being operated at night.  From a safety standpoint, the more visible your bicycle is to motorists, the safer you are.
  • High-visibility Clothing – There is a reason many bicycle jerseys are colored in bright neon.  It is safer for bicyclists when drivers are aware of their presence.
Obey the Rules of the Road
  • Bicycles are Vehicles – In California, cyclists must follow all traffic laws as if they were driving a car.  That means obeying all traffic signals and stop signs, riding on the right side of the road, and even following speed limits.  And yes, cyclists can be ticketed by traffic enforcement if they are spotted disobeying a traffic law.
  • Sidewalk Safety – California does not specify the legality of riding a bicycle on the sidewalk, leaving the decision up to local governments.  Some jurisdictions allow for cyclists to ride on the sidewalk while others outlaw it, so you may want to check before doing so.  Regardless, studies show that riding a bicycle on the sidewalk is much more likely to lead to a collision than riding on the road.
  • Crosswalk Safety – California also does not specify whether or not riding a bicycle in a crosswalk is prohibited.  Similarly, it is safer to walk a bicycle through a crosswalk than to ride through it.
  • Ride with Traffic – Cyclists should never ride against the flow of traffic.  Not only is it illegal, but it is incredibly dangerous.  A 1994 study concluded that riding against traffic increased accident risk by 360 percent and riding against traffic on a sidewalk increased accident risk by 430 percent.  Riding against traffic also increases the risk of a more serious collision.
Stay Vigilant
  • Assume You Are Invisible – Many drivers may not be actively looking out for bicycles on the road.  For cyclists, it is just safer to assume that no driver can see you and behave accordingly.  Avoid putting yourself in a situation that could become dangerous if a vehicle were to make a common maneuver, such as a turn or lane change.
  • Stay Out of Blind Spots – In an extension of the above tip, when you are biking in a driver’s blind spot you actually are invisible.
  • Do Not Bypass Stopped Vehicles – Attempting to pass vehicles queued at a stop sign or stop light is dangerous, as it typically involves biking in blind spots.  Vehicles will not have a chance to react to your presence.
  • Be Wary Biking Near Parked Vehicles – Drivers who have parked their vehicles and are attempting to exit may not be looking for cyclists and could open their doors directly into your path.
The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth encourages all cyclists to have fun and stay safe this summer.  Should an unfortunate accident occur, our team of personal injury attorneys will be there to help.  We provide free consultations and case evaluations at 888-517-9888.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Repetitive Motion Injuries at Work

Topics: Workers' Compensation

Feature
No one expects or wants to suffer an on the job injury, but injuries do happen; it is why employers are required by law to provide workers’ compensation coverage for their workers.  Workers’ compensation insurance is designed to provide benefits to injured workers when a work injury occurs.  Most workers understand that if they suffer an injury as the result of a sudden workplace accident, such as a fall from a ladder, car accident while on duty, or slip and fall, that they will be covered.  However, many workers overlook the possibility of an injury that occurs over time. Injuries that develop over time after continuously performing a task for weeks, months, or years are called repetitive motion injuries.  The most well-known type of repetitive motion injury is likely Capral Tunnel Syndrome, which can cause weakness, numbing, or tingling in the hand because of nerve pressure stemming from typing or writing. Other common types of repetitive injuries include tendinitis (inflammation of the tendons) and bursitis (inflammation of the bursae), both of which can affect many areas of the body, including the neck, shoulder, elbow, hips, and knees. Repetitive motion injuries can manifest as pain, discomfort, swelling, tingling, numbness, or weakness without any visible sign of injury or inflammation.  Due to their nature, many workers do not identify or report their repetitive motion injury early on and continue to perform their assigned tasks, further aggravating the injury.  Many workers only report the injury when the injury becomes painful and the discomfort become unbearable.  The delay in reporting the injury also makes the injury more difficult to treat. Fortunately for workers, repetitive motion injuries are eligible for workers’ compensation benefits.  If a worker suspects that he or she is developing a repetitive motion injury it is important to report it and seek treatment as early as possible, before it becomes a chronic problem.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth helps injured workers navigate the complex California workers’ compensation system.  We can help you seek treatment and compensation for lost wages.  We offer 100% free consultations and will not charge any fees if we cannot recover for you.  Call us today at 888-517-9888.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Premises Liability – Personal Injuries in Public Spaces Due to Negligence

Topics: Personal Injury

Feature
Premises liability is a subset of personal injury law that applies to many public and private spaces, including stores, public sidewalks, and even your neighbor’s yard.  While it may be lesser known than car accident law, premises liability law is extremely important if someone finds themselves injured due to the negligence of a homeowner, business, or the government.  If you have suffered an injury pursuable under premises liability law, you can seek financial compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and more. Premises liability is anchored in responsibility.  For example, homeowners are responsible for the safety of their guests.  If a homeowner is aware of a broken railing leading to their front door, does not repair it, and as a result a visitor leaning on that railing falls, the homeowner is considered to have caused that injury.  There are many different variations of common injuries which could be pursued as a premises liability case:
  • Any property left in dangerous conditions
  • Dog bites or other pet-related injuries
  • Unmarked wet or slippery floors
  • Broken railings, stairs, or steps
  • Lack of building or parking lot security
  • Unmaintained elevators or escalators
  • Broken lights obscuring clutter on the ground
If a person is injured due to negligence from any of these examples, or any other similar reason, he or she can pursue an injury claim against the responsible party.  Property owners are typically responsible for the cost of any medical bills, unpaid wages, property damage, and pain and suffering that occurs due to their negligence. Governments can also be found responsible for injuries under premises liability rules.  Public spaces that are poorly maintained or suffer any number of defects, including sidewalks, roads, traffic control devices, or anything typically handled by the government can lead to injury.  And if a lack of planning or execution is the reason for any injury, the government can be found liable for the cost of those injuries. The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth is a personal injury law firm that helps injury victims pursue insurance claims from negligent parties, including injuries resulting from violations of premises liability laws.  We offer free consultations and charge no fees if we do not win your case.  There is no risk.  Call us today at 888-517-9888 for your case evaluation.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Keeping Pedestrians Safe

Topics: Personal Injury

Feature
Pedestrian safety is not solely the responsibility of pedestrians; every driver carries just as much responsibility as any pedestrian.  While there are certain actions that pedestrians can take to become a better pedestrian, there are numerous tips and guidelines drivers can follow to protect pedestrians.  Pedestrians involved in a car crash are at extreme risk of injury and even death, which in some circumstances a driver can be held accountable for.  It is always important to practice defensive driving, but it is imperative to practice defensive driving in the presence of pedestrians, especially in urban areas.  More than 6,000 pedestrians were killed in 2019, accounting for about 17 percent of all crash-related fatalities that year. Driver Tips for Pedestrian Safety
  • Assume Responsibility – It is your responsibility as a driver to be conscious of the safety of pedestrians.  Simply acknowledging that pedestrians are out there will go a long way towards ensuring a safe drive for you and a safe trip for them.
  • Identify Pedestrians – Make a mental note when you see a pedestrian.  Knowing there are pedestrians in the immediate area can help you react to unexpected situations.
  • Avoid Distracted Driving – It is difficult to identify pedestrians if you are not watching the road.  Distracted driving is extremely dangerous for both drivers and pedestrians.  Do not text and drive.
  • Avoid Drunk Driving – Driving under the influence is against the law and carries stiff penalties.  Drivers impaired by alcohol or drugs who injure a pedestrian can face jail time.  Impaired drivers who seriously injure a pedestrian could face stiffer penalties.  Impaired drivers who kill a pedestrian could face vehicular manslaughter charges.
  • Look Both Ways Before Turning – If you are turning right, you may be focused only on traffic approaching from your left.  You should also focus on potential pedestrians approaching from your right.  Ensure there are no pedestrians in any direction before beginning your turn.
  • Look Behind You – Be sure to check your rearview mirror, side mirrors, and backup camera when reversing, especially in parking lots or driveways.
  • Obey Speed Limits – Speeding reduces reaction time.
  • Obey Traffic Signals – In addition to not crashing into other vehicles, obeying red lights and stop signs will prevent drivers from crashing into pedestrians too.  Traffic signals often have crosswalks as well.
  • Obey Crosswalk Rules – Pedestrians always have the right-of-way in crosswalks, marked or unmarked.  Drivers should stop before the crosswalk, stop light, stop sign, or marked stop line.
  • Do Not Pass Stopped School Buses – If a bus has its stop sign arm extended, drivers in both directions are legally required to stop except in certain circumstances.  See our previously published guide on stopping for school buses.
  • Never Assume – We all know the saying, but drivers should never assume that any pedestrian will behave in a predictable manner.
The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth helps the victims of car accidents, including pedestrians, pursue legal action against at-fault drivers.  We help injured pedestrians seek compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and lost wages.  Our accident attorneys are ready to help you recover physically and financially.  We offer 100% free consultations, so call us now at 888-517-9888.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Federal Independent Contractor Rule Rescinded

Topics: Employment Law

Feature
Announced Wednesday by the US Department of Labor and published yesterday, a Trump-era rule known as the “Independent Contractor Rule” which limited some workers’ rights was rescinded.  The Independent Contractor Rule limited the ability of gig workers, contract workers, and employees misclassified as independent contractors to pursue correct classification, minimum wage, and overtime.  The US Secretary of Labor says that the goal of the policy reversal is to “preserve essential worker rights and stop the erosion of worker protections”. The Department of Labor listed three main reasons why they are rescinding the rule:
  • The rule did not meet the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act and rulings by the judicial branch
  • The focus on two core factors (control over one’s work and one’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment) was not a balanced approach to determining employment relationships
  • The rule took too narrow a view to determine worker status
See the full Department of Labor press release here. A battle over this type of employee classification happened recently in California.  In 2019, California Assembly Bill 5 was passed, expanding the definition of what an employee is. AB 5 would have given employee benefits to many gig and contract workers, including Uber and Lyft drivers.  Before the law could take effect, the affected companies rallied behind Proposition 22, a 2020 ballot measure which exempted app-based drivers from AB 5, spending over $200 million to promote voting yes on Prop 22.  Prop 22 passed with 59 percent of the vote.  The passage of Prop 22 is one of several reasons why ridesharing companies are struggling to find enough drivers as demand begins to increase. Though the withdrawal of the Independent Contractor Rule only returns the government’s view of employee classification to the status quo, ride sharing companies have seen it as an attack on their business.  It is unknown what may happen if the 2020 battle over Prop 22 is taken to the national stage. Employment law protects the rights of workers, including workers who may be incorrectly classified as independent contractors.  Independent contractors who are misclassified lose access to many important employee benefits, including minimum wages, overtime pay, unemployment, and more.  Unsure if you should be classified as an employee or independent contractor?  The IRS provides some guidelines as to what workers should qualify as an employee. The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth’s employment law division can help employees misclassified as independent contractors ensure they receive all their entitled benefits.  Call us today at 888-517-9888 for a free consultation and case evaluation.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Exempt vs Non-Exempt

Topics: Employment Law

Feature
There are two types of employees: exempt and non-exempt.  This sounds like the setup to a joke, but classification actually has some very important distinctions in how the rules of employment law apply employees.  What does exempt and non-exempt even mean?  What are employees being exempted from?  How is exempt or non-exempt determined?  Understanding these questions can help ensure that workers are not being taken advantage of by their employers.  Violations of classification can be pursued for damages under employment law. There are two types of employees: exempt and non-exempt.  This sounds like the setup to a joke, but classification actually has some very important distinctions in how the rules of employment law apply employees.  What does exempt and non-exempt even mean?  What are employees being exempted from?  How is exempt or non-exempt determined?  Understanding these questions can help ensure that workers are not being taken advantage of by their employers.  Violations of classification can be pursued for damages under employment law. Exempt and non-exempt refers to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a law passed in 1938 addressing the abuses suffered by workers at the hands of employers.  The original FLSA set in to law the eight-hour day and 40-hour workweek America continues to see as normal today.  The FLSA provides requirements for minimum wages, overtime pay, and child labor.  The law, however, does not apply to all workers.  FLSA protections only apply to employees and are not extended to independent contractors.  And protections do not apply to all employees.  Employees protected by FLSA provisions are “non-exempt” from FLSA laws while employees not protected are “exempt” from FLSA laws. Non-exempt employees are entitled to a minimum wage, currently (California, 2020) $13/hr for businesses with more than 25 employees and $12/hr for business with 25 employees or fewer.  Those figures will rise by $1 every year on January 1 until they reach $15/hr.  Non-exempt employees are also entitled to overtime pay:
  • After 8 hours of work in 1 day – 1.5 times hourly rate
  • After 40 hours of work in 1 week – 1.5 times hourly rate
  • After 12 hours of work in 1 day – 2 times hourly rate
  • After 8 hours of work in 1 day on the 7th consecutive day of work – 2 times hourly rate
Non-exempt employees are often given additional benefits not provided under the FLSA, including rest and meal breaks.  Non-exempt workers in California are required to have at least 30 minutes of uninterrupted meal breaks for every 5 hours of work.  Because meal breaks are unpaid, workers cannot be required to work or remain on location.  Employers also must provide non-exempt employees with at least 10 minutes of uninterrupted break time for every 4 hours of work. Exempt employees, however, are not entitled to these same benefits.  Employers are not required to provide exempt employees with overtime pay, rest breaks, or meal breaks.  Exempt employees are not paid by the hour, but for the work they accomplish.  They have a set salary, which must be at least twice the minimum wage for full time employment, but paying an employee on a salary does not automatically classify the employee as exempt; exempt workers must typically meet other guidelines.  In California, employees typically classified as exempt include managers, administrators, professionals (such as doctors and lawyers), computer professionals, and salespersons.  Each category has specific guidelines that must be met to be considered exempt.  For overtime laws, the State of California Department of Industrial Relations website contains all employee classifications that are exempt. Exempt workers who believe they may be incorrectly classified and are entitled to overtime pay should contact an experienced employment law attorney.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help you determine if you should be compensated for overtime work and receive all of the benefits provided to exempt workers.  Call us today at 888-517-9888 for a free consultation. Exempt and non-exempt refers to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a law passed in 1938 addressing the abuses suffered by workers at the hands of employers.  The original FLSA set in to law the eight-hour day and 40-hour workweek America continues to see as normal today.  The FLSA provides requirements for minimum wages, overtime pay, and child labor.  The law, however, does not apply to all workers.  FLSA protections only apply to employees and are not extended to independent contractors.  And protections do not apply to all employees.  Employees protected by FLSA provisions are "non-exempt" from FLSA laws while employees not protected are "exempt" from FLSA laws. Non-exempt employees are entitled to a minimum wage, currently (California, 2020) $13/hr for businesses with more than 25 employees and $12/hr for business with 25 employees or fewer.  Those figures will rise by $1 every year on January 1 until they reach $15/hr.  Non-exempt employees are also entitled to overtime pay:
  • After 8 hours of work in 1 day - 1.5 times hourly rate
  • After 40 hours of work in 1 week - 1.5 times hourly rate
  • After 12 hours of work in 1 day - 2 times hourly rate
  • After 8 hours of work in 1 day on the 7th consecutive day of work - 2 times hourly rate
Non-exempt employees are often given additional benefits not provided under the FLSA, including rest and meal breaks.  Non-exempt workers in California are required to have at least 30 minutes of uninterrupted meal breaks for every 5 hours of work.  Because meal breaks are unpaid, workers cannot be required to work or remain on location.  Employers also must provide non-exempt employees with at least 10 minutes of uninterrupted break time for every 4 hours of work. Exempt employees, however, are not entitled to these same benefits.  Employers are not required to provide exempt employees with overtime pay, rest breaks, or meal breaks.  Exempt employees are not paid by the hour, but for the work they accomplish.  They have a set salary, which must be at least twice the minimum wage for full time employment, but paying an employee on a salary does not automatically classify the employee as exempt; exempt workers must typically meet other guidelines.  In California, employees typically classified as exempt include managers, administrators, professionals (such as doctors and lawyers), computer professionals, and salespersons.  Each category has specific guidelines that must be met to be considered exempt.  For overtime laws, the State of California Department of Industrial Relations website contains all employee classifications that are exempt. Exempt workers who believe they may be incorrectly classified and are entitled to overtime pay should contact an experienced employment law attorney.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help you determine if you should be compensated for overtime work and receive all of the benefits provided to exempt workers.  Call us today at 888-517-9888 for a free consultation.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Covid-Related Employment Law Stories in the News

Topics: Employment Law

Feature
Two news stories involving the intersection between the COVID-19 pandemic and employment law have been recently reported.  The Law Offices of Scott Warmuth has previously discussed both circumstances found in these recent news stories.  Issue 1: Your employer can fire you for not being vaccinated.  Issue 2: Exaggerating illness can lead to termination and possible criminal charges. It was reported on Thursday that CNN had fired three employees for coming in to work at one of the company's offices while unvaccinated.  The news came to light when a memo was sent to company employees by CNN President Jeff Zucker.  The memo specified that company policy states that vaccines are mandatory if an employee could come into contact with another employee and that there is a zero-tolerance policy on the issue.  CNN does not require proof of vaccination for its workers yet, so it was unclear how the fired employees were determined to be unvaccinated. See the news article here. It was reported on Wednesday that a firefighter for the city of Dallas was charged with felony theft for requesting and receiving paid time off for falsely claiming to have tested positive for the coronavirus.  In March, the accused firefighter reported to his work that his wife had tested positive for the coronavirus.  His work accepted his report, providing him paid time off.  After a week, the firefighter again called the department and reported his daughter had just tested positive and was granted an extra week of paid time off.  Then, two days prior to his expected return, he reported that he himself had tested positive.  He was granted another week of leave.  In total, the firefighter was granted over $12,000 in paid leave. After his return, the firefighter was asked for documentation of the positive coronavirus tests for him and his family.  Unable to produce them, he admitted to making the entire episode up.  According to bank records, at least part of his paid leave was spent on vacation. See the news article here. Advance parole is an immigration travel document that can make it very easy for immigrants seeking asylum or permanent residence to leave and re-enter the United States without harming their pending immigration applications.  Leaving the country while awaiting a green card or asylum hearing, even if you have been in the United States legally, could lead to being refused entry upon your return.  Worse, your pending immigration application would be rejected due to “abandonment”. Advance parole is received by filing Form I-131, Application for Travel Document.  For non-emergency travel, it can take several months for the form to be processed by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and a decision to be reached, so it is strongly suggested to plan ahead.  For emergency travel, such as a death in the family, medical concerns, or extreme business hardships, USCIS may issue a same-day advance parole document after an appointment at a local field office.  For emergency advance parole to be considered, applicants should bring a completed and signed Form I-131, the correct filing fee, two passport-style photos, and evidence of the emergency to their appointment. It is important to note that advance parole does not guarantee re-entry into the United States.  Similar to a visa, everyone who is not a US citizen is subject to an immigration review prior to being admitted into the country.  Some common reasons for being denied admission, even while possessing a valid advance parole document, include legal status expiring prior to reentry or previous unlawful presence in the country. When seeking advance parole, the most important things are completing the Form I-131 accurately, submitting it with the appropriate evidence with enough time to receive the travel documents prior to leaving the country, and completing biometrics capture at an Application Support Center (ASC) prior to departure.  If you are an immigrant to the United States and are planning to travel outside of the country, an experienced immigration law firm can help you determine if seeking advance parole is right for your situation.  If advance parole would be of benefit, the immigration lawyers at the Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help you complete the process quickly and accurately.  We provide free consultations at 888-517-9888.
WarmuthLaw
Resource Library

Advance Parole – Permission for Re-entry to the US Without a Visa

Topics: Immigration

Feature
Advance parole is an immigration travel document that can make it very easy for immigrants seeking asylum or permanent residence to leave and re-enter the United States without harming their pending immigration applications.  Leaving the country while awaiting a green card or asylum hearing, even if you have been in the United States legally, could lead to being refused entry upon your return.  Worse, your pending immigration application would be rejected due to "abandonment". Advance parole is received by filing Form I-131, Application for Travel Document.  For non-emergency travel, it can take several months for the form to be processed by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and a decision to be reached, so it is strongly suggested to plan ahead.  For emergency travel, such as a death in the family, medical concerns, or extreme business hardships, USCIS may issue a same-day advance parole document after an appointment at a local field office.  For emergency advance parole to be considered, applicants should bring a completed and signed Form I-131, the correct filing fee, two passport-style photos, and evidence of the emergency to their appointment. It is important to note that advance parole does not guarantee re-entry into the United States.  Similar to a visa, everyone who is not a US citizen is subject to an immigration review prior to being admitted into the country.  Some common reasons for being denied admission, even while possessing a valid advance parole document, include legal status expiring prior to reentry or previous unlawful presence in the country. When seeking advance parole, the most important things are completing the Form I-131 accurately, submitting it with the appropriate evidence with enough time to receive the travel documents prior to leaving the country, and completing biometrics capture at an Application Support Center (ASC) prior to departure.  If you are an immigrant to the United States and are planning to travel outside of the country, an experienced immigration law firm can help you determine if seeking advance parole is right for your situation.  If advance parole would be of benefit, the immigration lawyers at the Law Offices of Scott Warmuth can help you complete the process quickly and accurately.  We provide free consultations at 888-517-9888.